|
Issue: June-August 2011
Editorials
TRADE UNIONS
NUM takes a hard line on reform issues. Criticism of the process will sting,
as it’s designed to do. How best to respond is another matter entirely.
As the collective bargaining unit for workers in the mining, construction and electrical
engineering industries, the National Union
of Mineworkers (NUM) is the largest single Cosatu
affiliate. What it says, like it or not, is taken seriously;not least by government and a supportive ear from
Gwede Mantashe, ANC secretary general and former
NUM general secretary.
A secretariat report to the NUM central committee,
meeting in early June, outlines current thinking on
retirement funds that will certainly challenge its service
providers. At the least, this document invites much
closer engagement with NUM than appears so far to
have been the case.
On transformation: The funds of many mining and
construction companies remain untransformed, as do
the asset managers holding the assets of these funds. It
is shameful that, compared with black asset managers,
white asset managers have an overarching control over
most funds.
Most black asset managers are not rated (under the
BEE codes) and should at least aspire to Level 2 ratings
which is real economic empowerment. Most white asset
managers are on Level 4, representing the bad news
at the height of economic transformation. Mostly, the
untransformed asset managers hold massive assets of
the union funds (see table).
On the Financial Sector Charter: It must
be reviewed with increased NUM involvement.
Guidelines must be developed in the FSC to alter funds’
procurement policies to ensure radical implementation of
economic change in the funds. Fragmented funds in the
mining and construction industries must be consolidated
and racially-aligned funds must be eliminated.
On the Eskom fund: Moves by the company
to convert it a defined-benefit fund to a definedcontribution
fund must be resisted. Amongst other
reasons, current DB fund workers can easily predict
their own retirement pensions; the DB pension benefit
is protected from inflation by linking the pension to the
fund member’s salary at the time of retirement, and all
risks associated with the fund are the responsibility of
the employer.
On the Fidentia curatorship: The FSB has been
asked to explain when and how much members of
the NUM funds will be paid. So far there’ve been total
inflows of R260m while there are listed claimants for
R250m. The current amount available for distribution
is R87,3m. This is after expenditure of R44,2m on the
curatorship, a distribution of R106m to the Living
Hands Umbrella Trust, and certain provisions.
NUM will be seeking clarification from the curators
on these high fees. The R44,2m (rounded) is broken
into R9,6m for curators’ fees, R4,9m for forensic
accounting services; R13.9m for attorney fees; R12,4m
for counsel fees; a R1m provision for legal costs, and a
further R2,1m provision for FSB costs.
The document then reports on a gathering of over
100 delegates from the three major union federations
– Cosatu, Nactu and Fedusa – at a national retirement
funds conference in April. These concerns were raised:
- National Treasury has introduced proposals for
piecemeal reform of retirement funds, knowing
full well that these can’t take place outside
comprehensive social security reform. Piecemeal
reforms will not be sustainable and will not be
supported by organised labour;
- Proposals for mandatory preservation of retirement
funds (preventing workers from withdrawing funds
before retirement) can’t be implemented when
there is no income support for the majority of
unemployed workers;
- Treasury is calling for the termination of provident
funds, a complex and explosive issue which cannot
be addressed in such a high-handed way. We want
to assure workers that nothing will happen without
their consent;
- Treasury must cease these
counterproductive
interventions and submit to
the process of discussing the
comprehensive reforms. Organised
labour has been excluded from this
process which has evolved since
2007;
- This is an insult to workers.
Decisions are being taken about
them on critical areas of interest,
including how their pensions (which
are deferred pay) are managed.
Fiery language, to be sure. Never
a dull moment in this industry . . .
Also worth recording is that,
nationwide, NUM now has 122
members on trustee training. Of
these, 23 are in the PWV region
and six are in head office. There
are an additional nine members
already serving on various trustee
boards.
Asset managers of NUM funds
Absa Asset Management |
Level 4 |
90.4 |
Advantage Asset Managers |
Level 3 |
31.0 |
Investment Solutions |
Level 3 |
146.3 |
Coronation Fund Managers |
Level 4 |
164.4 |
Kagiso Asset Management |
Rate A (FSC) |
17.8 |
Investec Asset Management |
Level 4 |
262.4 |
Prescient Investment Management |
Level 6 |
69.9 |
Prudential Portfolio Managers |
Rate A (FSC) |
92.2 |
Element Investment Managers |
Rate A (FSC) |
17.9 |
Allan Gray |
Rate A (FSC) |
275.9 |
Afena Capital |
Level 1 |
8.2 |
Argon Asset Management |
Level 1 |
7.0 |
OMIGSA |
Level 4 |
424.5 |
RMBAM |
Level 4 |
145.0 |
Sanlam Investment Management |
Level 4 |
297.3 |
JM Busha |
Level 4 |
2.3 |
Metropolitan Asset Managers |
Level 3 |
54.9 |
Mergence Africa |
Level 2 |
5.0 |
Futuregrowth Asset Management |
Level 4 |
87.8 |
Taquanta Asset Managers |
Level 4 |
41.4 |
Cadiz Asset Management |
Level 4 |
52.3 |
Source: National Union of Mineworkers
|